Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56718/2023dismissed

Principal Kumar @ Princpal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-30Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56718 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-684 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== PRINCIPAL KUMAR @ PRINCPAL KUMAR SON OF RAMKARAN SINGH @ SRI RAMKARAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - RAMDIRI, (RAMDIRI NAKTI) NAKTI TOLA, P.S. - MATIHANI, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-08-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 684 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 398, 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act and later Section 302 has also been added.

4. The petitioner is the assailant of the deceased and is in custody since 07.04.2021.

5. As per the prosecution case, when the informant reached his shop on the information that firing was made at his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56718 of 2023(2) dt.30-08-2023 2/2 shop then he came to know that some criminals who were armed with weapons also entered into the shop and one of the criminals fired at the guard who has subsequently died.

6. This is a case of loot and murder and materials have come during investigation to connect the petitioner with the crime and the petitioner has six criminal antecedents also.

7. In view of the facts and circumstances, as mentioned above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

9. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and if there is delay in the trial then the petitioner may approach this Court.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U T