← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17859/2019disposed

Najlish Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-24Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17859 of 2019 ====================================================== Najlish Khatoon Wife of Nurul Islam Resident of Vill.-Dhachna, P.S.-Barsoi, Distt.-Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Government of BIhar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, District-Katihar.

4.

The District Programme Officer, District-Katihar 5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Block-Barsoi, District-Katihar. 6.

Minnati Khatoon Wife of Md. Zubair, Resident of Vill.-Kota, P.O.-Balupada, P.S.-Barsoi, Distt.-Katihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shahzad Hassan Khan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.K.Madanl (SC-3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has questioned the selection of respondent No.6 as Anganbari Sevika for Centre No. 371, under Panchayat Raj-Chandpara (Ward No.3) in the District of Katihar.

3. Selection to the post of Anganbari Sevika is made in accordance with the guidelines issued for selection under Integrated Child Development Services. The petitioner has remedy of making complaint under the guidelines itself before

Patna High Court CWJC No.17859 of 2019(3) dt.24-10-2019 2/2 the Child Development Project Officer, Katihar. The guidelines have been brought on record by way of Annexure P/1 to the writ application, which indicates that the petitioner could have made complaint against selection of respondent No.6.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances, this application is disposed of with an observation that the petitioner shall be at liberty to question the selection of respondent No.6 before appropriate forum, in accordance with law. If any complaint is made within one month from today, the same shall not be rejected on the ground of delay in making the complaint, since the petitioner was pursuing her remedy before this Court by filing the present writ application.

5. This disposes of the application.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) arun/- U