Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41604 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -181 Year- 2016 Thana -LAHERIASARAI District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Aman Kumar son of Shyam Kahu Roy, resident of Village - Raghauli, P.S. - Bisfi, District - Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. R.P. Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 02.05.2016 in connection with Laheriya Sarai P.S. Case No. 181 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on mere suspicion and on hearsay, and the thrust of accusation is against co-accused Allauddin. Similarly situated coaccused Kailash Kumar Mahto and others have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 27633 of 2016 and analogous cases.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41604 of 2016 (2) dt.20-10-2016 thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Laheriya Sarai P.S. Case No. 181 of 2016, with the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T