Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48436 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2018 Thana -NARHAT District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Ashok Kumar S/o Sri Chandeshwar Singh, R/o Vill.- Repura, P.S.- Narhat (Sitamarhi O.P.), District- Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Gulnar Begam, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2018 . Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Narhat (Sitamarhi) P.S. Case No. 152 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 506, 504 and 553 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner abused and gave threatening to the informant to withdraw the case.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and earlier the informant, who is working as Circle Officer, have shown the Government land as his own land and when the petitioner highlighted the aforesaid mis-deed of the informant, the present
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48436 of 2018 (2) dt.24-08-2018 2/2 case has been lodged against the petitioner.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- V, Nawadah in connection with Narhat (Sitmarhi) P. S. Case No. 152 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/Ranjeet U T