Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47801/2016rejected

Sumer Sharma @ Sumeshar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2016-11-23Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47801 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -219 Year- 2014 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ====================================================== Sumer Sharma @ Sumeshar Sharma, S/o Late Sukhdeo Sharma, resident of Village- Sandha Newajitola, P.S. Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Smt. Suman Kumari Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 02.03.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 53495 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 24.10.2014 and up till now no prosecution witness has been examined, only charges have been frame though there was direction to expedite the trial. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer by submitting that in F.S.L. report aluminum phosphide was detected and there is allegation for demanding of dowry repeatedly by the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47801 of 2016 (3) dt.23-11-2016 2/2 prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Chapra Muffassil P.S. Case No. 219 of 2014 corresponding to S.Tr. No. 487 of 2015 pending in the Court of 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Saran, Chapra.

However, considering the detention of the petitioner the trial court is directed to expedite the trail and to conclude the same preferably within six months, failing which if the petitioner at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T