Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44757/2017bail granted

Arman Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44757 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44757 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2017 Thana -GOPALPUR District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Arman Ali Son of Sageer Ahmad, Resident of Village- Aamwan Dubey, Police Station- Turk Pati, District- Khusinagar (U.P.). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 40 litres of country made liquor from a Van.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case as he was only the passenger of the vehicle from which alleged recovery has been made. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 22.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44757 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -II, Gopalganj, in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T