Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57111/2023allowed

Saurabh Sah @ Sourabh Kumar Sah @ Saurabh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-08Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57111 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2022 Thana- NTPC District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== SAURABH SAH @ SOURABH KUMAR SAH @ SAURABH KUMAR S/O ASHOK SAH RESIDENT OF ALIGANJ, PS. MOJAHIDPUR (BABARGANJ), DIST. BHAGALPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown persons stolen the motorcycle of the informant, when he parked his motorcycle at the main door of the temple.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57111 of 2023(2) dt.08-09-2023 2/2 statement of co-accused Ajay Mahto, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 16.11.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with NTPC P.S. Case No. 75 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U