Bajrangi Kamat @ Bajrang Kumar Kamat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54559 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- KISHANPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Bajrangi Kamat @ Bajrang Kumar Kamat S/o Late Ramnath Kamat R/o Tharbitta, P.S.- Kishanpur, Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Goutam, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, petitioner assaulted him by farsa causing injury while Gunanand Kamat assaulted by Kudal causing injury on head and Sunita assaulted by bricks on his chest, thereafter accused persons also assaulted his father while Shivanand fired but missed, thereafter Uman and Sukhdev also assaulted him by brick and stone, further Rubi

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54559 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/3 Devi threw bricks on head while Neelam assaulted his uncle by brick, thereafter Yashoda assaulted his brother by brick and threw chilly powder in his eyes.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting the informant on head causing injury is against Gunanand, it is also submitted that though it is alleged in the FIR that petitioner also assaulted by farsa but then it is not even remotely suggested that on which body part, the petitoner assaulted. It is next submitted that no doubt one of the injuries is opined to be grievous caused by hard and blunt substance, but since specific allegation of assaulting the informant on head is against Gunanand, as such, petitioner be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54559 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 3/3 anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kishunpur P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T