Kamta Kumar @ Kamta Kumar Singh @ Kamta Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42234 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -60 Year- 2017 Thana -ROSHANGAANJ District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Kamta Kumar @ Kamta Kumar Singh @ Kamta Singh S/o Late Dasu Singh Bhokta, resident of Village- Babu Bandh, P.S. Madanpur, District Aurangabad.

2. Sajiv Kumar @ Sanjiv Kumar S/o Momtar Singh Bhokta, resident of Village- Sandaha Tola Chaparwar, P.S. Banke Bazar, District Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Roshanganj P.S.Case No.60 of 2017 , registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275, 276, 419, 420, 467, 468, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 64(2) (A), 18A, 18D, 26, 27(a) of Drug Act.

Allegation against the petitioners is of running a clinic and also conducting operation though they have no degree or licence for running clinic and operating the people. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have taken degree of operation theatre. The petitioners have been arrested and made accused in this case and they are in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42234 of 2017 (3) dt.13-09-2017 2/2 custody since 29.4.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of allegation as well as recovery of huge medicines and other articles of operation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of seven months and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the court concerned.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T