← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44764/2017bail granted

Deepak Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44764 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44764 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -819 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Deepak Kumar, son of Lakhichandra Sah,

2. Ajay Sah, Son of Late Jagdish Sah, Both resident of Bharahi (Jiwachhpur) P.S. + Dist.- Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Smt. Rashmi Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 819 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 45 litres of foreign liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have no criminal antecedent and have been in judicial custody since 06.08.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44764 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Saharsa, in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 819 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T