← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./237/2023dismissed

Rajnish Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-31Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.237 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20417 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Rajnish Prasad Son of late Deogan Prasad, Resident of Village- Tilaiya, P.S.- Chhabilapur, District- Nalanda.

2.

Ranjit Prasad Son of Late Deogan Prasad, Resident of Village- Tilaiya, P.S.- Chhabilapur, District- Nalanda.

3.

Ashok Kumar Son of Late Ramji Prasad, Resident of Village- Tilaiya, P.S.- Chhabilapur, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Collector, Nalanda.

3.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif. 4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Rajgir, Nalanda.

5.

The Executive Engineer, P H E D department, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif. 6.

The Circle Officer, Rajgir, Nalanda.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag 12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-10-2025 I.A. No. 01 of 2025 Interlocutory Application No. 01 of 2025 has been filed for substitution of the names of the legal heirs and representatives of petitioner no. 3, Ashok Kumar, who died on 16.03.2025.

2. For the reasons mentioned in the interlocutory application, I.A. No. 01 of 2025 is allowed.

3. The legal heirs of petitioner no. 3, as mentioned in

Patna High Court C. REV. No.237 of 2023(3) dt.31-10-2025 2/2 paragraph 5 of the I.A., are directed to be substituted in place of petitioner no. 3.

C. Rev. No. 237 of 2023

4. In my opinion, this review application is not maintainable.

5. Accordingly, the same is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appropriate application for damages, if so advised.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Neha/- U