Natu Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44291 of 2017 (2) dt.22-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44291 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2017 Thana -RAMPUR District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Natu Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar, Son of Late Shiv Bachan Yadav @ Late Shiv Bachchan Yadav, Resident of Mohalla-Rampur, P.S.-Rampur, District-gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Surendra Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rampur P.S.Case No.49 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 387 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of demand of extortion of Rs.5,000/- from the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is co-villager of the informant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Further submission is that charge has also been framed in this case. The petitioner is in custody for about seven months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44291 of 2017 (2) dt.22-09-2017 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Rampur P.S.Case No.49 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T