Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44984/2017bail granted

Md. Sajid v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44984 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44984 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -307 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSAHARSA ======================================================

1. Md. Sajid Son of Md. Abu Talim @ Md. Abu Taliv, R/o VillageMadheli, Ward No.12, P.S.- Sankarpur, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Saharsa Special Case No. 307 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 25.8 litres of foreign liquor from tata sumo vehicle.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he happens to be driver of the vehicle from which alleged recovery was made and has nothing to do with the said recovery. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 01.08.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44984 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -II-Cum Special Judge, Excise, Saharsa, in connection with Saharsa Special Case No. 307 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T