Ravindra Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43558 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2016 Thana -BARH District- PATNA ====================================================== Ravindra Das Son of Rajendra Das, Resident of village- Akbarpur, Police Station- Barh, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 14.06.2016 in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 123 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 363, 366(A) and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against unknown. The so-called victim girl has since returned and in her deposition under Section 164 Cr. P.C. she has stated that she had gone willingly along with one Sintu with whom she had solemnized marriage and the petitioner has not been named therein.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna, in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 123 of 2016, with the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43558 of 2016 (2) dt.22-10-2016 the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure to do so on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T