Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46415/2016bail granted

Harichandra Uraon v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46415 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2016 Thana -MANPUR District- WESTCHAMPARAN (BETTIAH) ====================================================== Harichandra Uraon, Son of Late Jhuna Uraon, Resident of Village Chakarsan, P.S. Manpur, District West Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2016 in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 47(a) and 54 of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as he had no concern whatsoever with the motor-cycle from which recovery of 25 litres of country made liquor is said to have been made. It is further stated that the petitioner has not been supplied the copy of the seizure list. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 25 of 2016 with the following conditions:

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46415 of 2016 (2) dt.22-10-2016 2/2 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T