Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49622/2016bail granted

Vimlendu Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-13Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49622 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2015 Thana -RAXAUL District- EASTCHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Bimlendu Ranjan, son of Mukti Nath Ojha, resident of Village- Laxmipur Police station- Palanwan in the district of East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 13.09.2016 in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 183 of 2015 for the alleged offences under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusation of firing is general and omnibus against all the accused persons. The informant has suffered one injury on the right hand being non-vital part of the body. Even according to the FIR there was money dispute between the parties and it is submitted that this was the reason for the false implication.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Raxaul at Motihari in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 183 of 2015 on the following conditions -

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49622 of 2016 (2) dt.13-12-2016 2/2 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/B.T.

U T