← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8865/2007dfd for non appearance

Bhola Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-26Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8865 of 2007 ====================================================== Bhola Ansari, son of Khudabin Ansari, , resident of village-Bawaria, P.O.- Kritpur, P.S.-Paharpur, District-East Champaran at Motihari. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari.

3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Areraj, P.S.-Gobind Ganj, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

4. Harendra Nath Dubey, son of late Badri Narayan Dubey

5. Faninder Nath Dubey, son of late Badari Narayan Dubey Respondent nos.4&5 resident of village-Kritpur-Mathiya, P.O.-Kritpur, P.S.-Harsidhi, Anchal-Harsidhi, District-East Champaran at Motihari.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent nos.1to3 : Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay, SC-20 Mr.Naresh Prasad, AC to SC-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners are printed in the daily cause list.

Learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the official respondents, on the other hand, submits that the impugned order cannot be legally faulted.

Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

Arvind/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) U