Bipin Kumar @ Lalu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66362 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2021 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== BIPIN KUMAR @ LALU KUMAR Son of Gori Singh @ Gauri Singh Resident of Village - Chechar, P.S.- Bidupur, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Excise Case G.R. No. 332 of 2021 arising out of Bidupur P.S. Case No. 134 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections-30(a)/41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 2598.88 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66362 of 2021(2) dt.10-12-2021 2/3 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is alleged that out of 2598.88 litres, 2324.8 wine is recovered from the truck, 180 litres wine is recovered from Bolero and 90 litres wine is recovered from the car. None of the vehicles belongs to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by local chowkidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66362 of 2021(2) dt.10-12-2021 3/3 Act, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Excise Case G.R. No. 332 of 2021 arising out of Bidupur P.S. Case No. 134 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T