Sohra Khatoon @ Munni @ Talhat Praveen v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63237 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28428 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-467 Year-2020 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Sohra Khatoon @ Munni @ Talhat Praveen Wife of Md. Izahar Alam @ Md. Izahar Resident of Guruchak (Wrongly mentioned in the F.I.R. as Makhdumpur), P.O.- Rajhat, P.S.- Akbarpur, District - Nawada. 2.

Md. Izahar Alam @ Md. Izahar Son of Mukhatar Alam Resident of Guruchak (Wrongly mentioned in the F.I.R. as Makhdumpur), P.O.- Rajhat, P.S.- Akbarpur and District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh Shastri, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The present application has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 06.07.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28428 of 2021, whereby the petitioners were granted the privilege of anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender within twelve weeks.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the personal bail bond had earlier been accepted by the C.J.M. Nawada. It is further submitted that when the petitioners approached the court on 01.07.2025 to furnish the bail bonds,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63237 of 2025(2) dt.11-03-2026 2/2 the same were refused on the ground of delay. Learned counsel further submits that Court concerned with the case may be directed to accept the bail bond at this belated stage.

4. Having considered the submissions and upon perusal of the records, it is evident that the order sought to be modified was passed on 06.07.2021 and the present application has been filed only in 2025, after an inordinate and unexplained delay.

5. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to modify the order dated 06.07.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28428 of 2021.

6. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed.

7. It is made clear that if the petitioners surrender before the learned Trial Court, their prayer for bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Rajesh/- U T