Rinu Turaha @ Rinu Shah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55145 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-515 Year-2023 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Rinu Turaha @ Rinu Shah S/o Shiv Nath Shah R/o Village- Bhagwanpur, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyendra Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Mr. Satyendra Rai learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 515 / 2023 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 341,323,324,307,379,504,506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioner with a common intention to kill assaulted the informant and his family memebrs, causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is admitted land

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55145 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/3 dispute between the parties and Title Suit No.222 of 2023 is going on. There is case and counter case between the parties and due to land dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioner may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and his family members without intention.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties and due to land dispute, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioner may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and his family members without intention, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55145 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 3/3 satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Goplaganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 515 / 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T