← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16164/2014disposed

Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-14Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16164 of 2014 ====================================================== Meena Devi W/o- Sri Rameshwar Sah, R/o- Village- Deep Nagar, Gram Panchayat- Haripur, Block + P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Directorate of I.C.D.S., Department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa

4. The District Magistrate, District- Supaul

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Birpur, District- Supaul

6. The Block Development Officer, Raghopur, District- Supaul

7. The Child Development Project Officer, Block- Raghopur, DistrictSupaul

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat- Haripur, Block- Raghopur, District- Supaul

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat- Haripur, Block- Raghopur, DistrictSupaul

10. Sunita Bharti @ Sunita Devi W/o- Sri Ashok Sah, R/o- Village- Deep Nagar, Gram Panchayat- Haripur, Block + P.S.- Raghopur, DistrictVaishali .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Purnendu Singh, GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 14-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No.1990 of 2015 (Usha Devi Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case. In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is

Patna High Court CWJC No.16164 of 2014 (2) dt.14-09-2018 2 /2 directed to examine the facts, law and relief of the case of petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny U