Sunita Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar , Patna And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1090 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Sunita Devi Wife Of Ram Subhag Sah Resident Of Village- Madhopur, P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna
3. The Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra
4. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj
5. The Inspector General of Police, Weaker Cell Crime Investigation Department, Bihar, Patna
6. The Zonal Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur Zone, Muzaffarpur
7. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran at Chapra
8. The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj
9. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj
10. The Officer-In-Charge, Barauli Police Station, Gopalganj
11. The Investigating Officer Of Barauli Police Station Case No. 30 Of 2009, P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagnnath Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, A.C. to GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is informant of Barauli P.S.Case No. 30 of 2009 dated 18.03.2009 registered for the offence punishable under section 376 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. In this application filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the prayer of the petitioner in paragraph 1 is as under :- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ/Rule/Direction commanding
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1090 of 2013 (6) dt.02-03-2015 2/2 the respondent authorities to conclude the investigation of Barauli Police Station Case No. 30 of 2009 dated 18.03.2009 registered under Section 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and arrest the accused persons of the case, and submit final form within a reasonable time."
This application was filed before this Court in November, 2013. During the pendency of the case, final report vide F.F. No. 28/14 dated 31.01.2014 has already been submitted in the court on 17.04.2014. Since the Investigating Officer has not sent up the accused for trial, learned Magistrate has issued notice to the informant and the matter is pending for consideration before the Magistrate.
In that view of the matter, this application has become infructuous. Once a report under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed in the court, it is for the Magistrate to apply his mind and pass appropriate orders. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as infructuous. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- U T