Subodh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53036 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -165 Year- 2016 Thana -ALOULI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Subodh Yadav, Son of Brahmadeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Allouli, P.S.- Allouli, District- Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Allouli P.S.Case no.165 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 364, 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the case is under Section 302 of the IPC and other Sections. It further appears that the petitioner is accused in seven other cases. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no specific allegation has been attributed against him rather the same is against one co-accused Dharamvir Yadav and the coaccused persons having similar allegation has already been granted bail by this Court, vide order dated 22.6.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No.17653 of 2017.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53036 of 2017 (2) dt.21-11-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned F.T.C., First, Khagaria in connection with Allouli P.S.Case no.165 of 2016 corresponding to G.R.no.1399 of 2016 arising out of S.C.Case No.93 of 2017. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(iv) The petitioner will appear before the local police station of his area in the first week of each month for a period of one year so that the police may watch is conduct, otherwise his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T