Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51127 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2017 Thana -MANPUR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Ranjit Yadav son of Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village - Bibhutipur, P.S. Bihar, Distt. - Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 326, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of assault to the informant by butt portion of the rifle causing injury to the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is case and counter case between the parties and had it been the intention of the petitioner to kill the informant, he would have made fire from the said gun. It has also been submitted that petitioner side has also received injuries. Petitioner has been in judicial custody for last three months.

Learned counsel for the State as well as informant opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the injury was grievous in nature.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51127 of 2017 (2) dt.13-11-2017 2/2 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -III, Biharsharif, Nalanda, in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2017,subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T