Ranjan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67565 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-506 Year-2020 Thana- CHANDI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

RANJAN PASWAN Son of Satendra Paswan Resident of Village - Rupaspur, P.S.- Chandi, Distt.- Nalanda.

2.

Amarjeet Paswan Son of Kaushal Paswan Resident of Village - Rupaspur, P.S.- Chandi, Distt.- Nalanda.

3.

Satendra Paswan Son of Parmeshwar Paswan Resident of Village - Rupaspur, P.S.- Chandi, Distt.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners are permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

The allegation against the petitioners are that the petitioners assaulted the informant and his family members.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67565 of 2021(2) dt.06-06-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the FIR that there is general and omnibus allegation of assault of against all the accused persons and there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. He further submits that injury report in the case diary suggest that injury is abrasion, swelling and it is simple in nature.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 506 of 2020, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T