← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28486/2015bail granted

Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-08-10Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28486 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -42 Year- 2012 Thana -ARWAL District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Kaushal Kumar, Son of Satyendra @ Ravindra Yadav, Resident of Village - Rajipur, P.S. - Rani Talab, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Veena Rani Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 10-08-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR. After lapse of three years, the police filed requisition on 12.01.2015 by adding parentage and address of the petitioner. It is specifically mentioned in the FIR that Kaushal Kumar is the son of not known, resident of village-Sakari, P.S.-Arwal, District- Arwal, whereas, the petitioner is the son of Satyendra @ Ravindra Yadav, resident of village-Rajipur, P.S.-Rani Talab, District- Patna. The petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2015 having no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28486 of 2015 (2) dt.10-08-2015 2/2 antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Arwal P.S. Case No.42 of 2012 with the following conditions : 1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T