Bholu Kuraishi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66242 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Bholu Kuraishi Son of Md. Bali Kuraishi Resident of Village- Narhat, P.S.- Narhat, District- Nawada.

2.

Nazo Son of Md. Vali Resident of Village- Narhat, P.S.- Narhat, DistrictNawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra For the Informant : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Mahila P.S. Case No. 31 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, specific accusation of establishing physical relation with the informant is against coaccused Atabul Kuraishi. It is submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. There is no allegation of any overt act against the petitioners. Petitioner no. 1 is uncle of co-accused Atabul Kuraishi and the only allegation against him is that he

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66242 of 2021(2) dt.24-05-2022 2/2 called the co-accused Atabul Kuraishi while he was at the house of informant/victim girl. Petitioners have got clean antecedents. Counsel for informant however vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners abovenamed, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nawada in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 31 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T