Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40171/2014bail granted

Pushp Raj Yadav @ Pushpa Yadav @ Pushp Raj Kumar @ Pushp v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-18Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40171 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2011 Thana -NAUGACHIA District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Pushp Raj Yadav @ Pushpa Yadav @ Pushp Raj Kumar @ Pushp .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Shankar Das(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-02-2015 The petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in a case registered under Section 395 of the I.P.C and Section 3(2)(v) of SC 7 ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Accusation is of committing dacoity in the petroleum dealership and snatching money from the customers of the petroleum dealer. The name of the petitioner sprang up on confession of the co-accused.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that except confession of petitioner before the police and confession of the co-accused, there is nothing recovered from the petitioner. The earlier bail of the petitioner was rejected since petitioner has serious criminal antecedent when liberty was given to renew the prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within a period of one year.

A statement has been made in para 18 of the petition that no witness has been examined till date. Considering the fact that trial is not likely to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40171 of 2014 (2) dt.18-02-2015 2/2 be concluded in near future, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2012, arising out of Naugachia P.S. Case No. 98 of 2011.

Considering the serious criminal antecedent of the petitioner, learned Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if the petitioner defaults for two consecutive occasions or gets substantially involved in serious nature of offence.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/- U T