Md. Abdul Sattar, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16776 of 2019 ====================================================== Md. Abdul Sattar, Son of Md. Nabi, resident of Manjhauliya, Jhapaha, Muzaffarpur, Bihar, Pin- 842004.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Bihar Medical Services, and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., 4th Floor, Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Hospital Road, Shashtri Nagar, Patna- 23.
3.
The Managing Director, Bihar Medical Services, and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. 4th Floor, Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Hospital Road, Shashtri Nagar, Patna- 23. 4.
The Chief General Manager,Bihar Medical Services, and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. 4th Floor, Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Hospital Road, Shashtri Nagar, Patna- 23. 5.
The General Manager, Bihar Medical Services, and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., 4th Floor, Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Hospital Road, Shashtri Nagar, Patna- 23. 6.
The Deputy General Manager (Project), Bihar Medical Services, and Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., 4th Floor, Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Hospital Road, Shashtri Nagar, Patna- 23. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Roona, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Ravi Kumar, AC to GP-13 For the Res. Nos. 2 to 6 :
Mr.R.V. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Respondent no. 2 are present.
In the nature of the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, it would only be just and proper for the petitioner to represent before the respondent no. 3 for taking an appropriate
Patna High Court CWJC No.16776 of 2019(2) dt.21-10-2019 2/2 view of the matter.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact the petitioner has already made a request in this regard to respondent no. 5 vide Annexure 'P/6' to the writ application. The petitioner, if so advised, may file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 3 who will consider the same and shall take an appropriate view of the matter within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
The writ application is disposed off accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/ved U