Abhiram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48036 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -146 Year- 2013 Thana -JHANJHARPUR District- MADHUBANI ======================================================
1. Abhiram Yadav Son of Kaleshwar Yadav Resident of Village Tengraha PS Bheja Distt- Madhubani.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No. 146 of 2013 for the offence punishable under sections 365, 386, 413, 414, 379, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing was recovered from possession of the petitioner nor he has been put on T.I. parade. Even from the materials collected during the course of investigation, only suspicion has been raised and he is in custody since 17.07.2014.
Heard learned A.P.P. also who has opposed the prayer
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48036 of 2016 (4) dt.18-01-2017 2/2 for bail and has stated that the informant has disclosed the name of the petitioner in the first information report as well as in his further statement and other witnesses have also stated the name of the petitioner. Apart from this case, the petitioner is also accused in a large number of cases i.e. ten cases which have been mentioned in paragraph 3 of the bail application itself. Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that there is allegation under section 365 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and the petitioner is named in the first information report and apart from this, he is accused in a large number of cases, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application for bail is, accordingly, dismissed.
However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and shall try to conclude the same as early as possible . (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Amin/- U