← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16193/2019disposed

Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-18Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16193 of 2019 ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Son of Madhusudan Prasad, Resident of Baratpur Mohalla- Ward No. 30, P.S. and District- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Aurangabad. 3.

The Civil S.D.O., Aurangabad.

4.

The Block Supply Officer, Madanpur.

5.

The Officer In-charge, Madanpur P.S., Aurangabad. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking release of the Truck bearing Registration No. BR26GA-5114, Chasis No. MAT541089J1H24811, Engine No.

ISBE5.91804081H63721319 in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Section 419/420 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. After the Hon'ble Full Bench judgment of this Court in the Case of Baleshwar Roy and Anr Vs. The State of

Patna High Court CWJC No.16193 of 2019(2) dt.18-10-2019 2/3 Bihar and Ors reported in 2018 (4) PLJR 970 this Court has been consistently taking a view that wherever no confiscation proceeding has been initiated in respect of the vehicle, the petitioner may file an appropriate application before the court below for release of the vehicle and in case where a confiscation proceeding has been initiated, application for release may be filed before the Confiscating Officer.

In the present case learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no confiscation proceeding has yet been initiated. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the State submits that petitioner may apply for provisional release of the vehicle in the court below itself in terms of Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In the given facts and circumstances, since the petitioner has a statutory remedy by filing an appropriate application in the court below for provisional release of vehicle in question, this writ application is being disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in the court below itself. In case such an application is filed on behalf of the petitioner, the same will be considered by the court below and an appropriate order thereon shall be passed within a period of 30 days from the date of filing of the application.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16193 of 2019(2) dt.18-10-2019 3/3 This writ application stands disposed off accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) vats/ved U