Rahul Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55265 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2025 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Rahul Ranjan S/O Late Balram Singh @ Late Balram 2.
Rohit Ranjan S/O Late Balram Singh @ Late Balram Both are R/O Village- Chainpura (Mahavir Asthan Kushwaha Panchayat Baithaka) P.S.- Bypass, Distt- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Udai Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Mr. Udai Shankar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 100 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 308(2), 303(2), 308(3), 352 and 3(5), of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioners along with 5-6 unknown persons assaulted the informant and her Gotni, while they were making boundary wall on their land. The accused persons also demanded a sum of rupees five lakhs from the informant in order to do work on the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55265 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/3 said land.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that no injury has been caused to the informant or any person. The title suite between the parties is pending before the learned District Court. There is case and counter case between the parties arising out of same incidence.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that there is land dispute between the parties and there is case and counter case between them, arising out of same incidence, I am of the opinion that petitioners have, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Patna City in connection with Bypass P.S. Case No. 100 of 2025, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55265 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T