Amit Kumar Singh @ Bittu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56037 of 2018 (2) dt.08-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56037 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Amit Kumar Singh @ Bittu Singh, Son of Late Chandra Kumar Singh @ Late Chandra Kishor Singh, Resident of Village- Gangjala, Ward No. 17, P.S. Saharsa Sadar, District- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 08-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 384, 386, 387 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 209 of 2015.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with business dispute which is sought to be given an appearance of a criminal case. The parties are known to each other and related. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56037 of 2018 (2) dt.08-10-2018 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 209 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T