Ravi Ranjan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41299 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2017 Thana -ARA RAIL P.S. District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Ravi Ranjan Paswan Son of Anand Paswan Resident of Village - Chokipur, P.S. Udwant Nagar, District - Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ara Rail P.S. Case No. 41 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and later on added Section 414/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner that he along with other accused persons snatched mobile phone and cash. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and in the Test Identification Parade, informant has not identified the petitioner. Further petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has

been in judicial custody since 07.07.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that petitioner's name transpired on this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Railway Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara, in connection with Ara Rail P.S. Case No. 41 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates

without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T