Pawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19719 of 2021 ====================================================== Pawan Kumar son of Sri Bharat Prasad, resident of Ward No. 5, P.O. and P.S.- Chiraiya, District-East Champaran, PIN-845415. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah.

4.

The Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur at Arrah. 5.

The District Mining Officer, Bhojpur at Arrah. 6.

The District Transport Officer, Bhojpur at Arrah. 7.

The Officer-in-Charge, Barahara Police Station, District-Bhojpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Mohan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Gyan Prakash Ojha (GA 7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 01-02-2022 Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) :- "That the present writ petition is being filed on behalf of the petitioner for release of or refund of Rs.2,92,313/- the (Rupees Two Lacs Ninety Two Thousand and Three Hundred Thirteen) only deposited by the petitioner against the release of his vehicle bearing Registration no. GJ 12Y 5273 and for further order/orders, direction/directions to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 15.11.2021 and

Patna High Court CWJC No.19719 of 2021(2) dt.01-02-2022 2/2 for other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner in the facts and circumstances of the case may entitle to." After the mater was head for some time, finding the Bench not to be in favour of the submission so made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petition may be permitted to withdrawn reserving liberty to challenge the intervening developments before the appropriate forum.

Prayer allowed.

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/chn U