Dilip Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60877 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2024 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Dilip Rai, Son of Ramanand Rai Resident of Village - Gopnathpur, P.S.- Dumra, District - Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of five cases, but then, out of five cases, three cases came to instituted by the informant and his side and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioner came on 02.05.2024 at 9.35 A.M., when the informant along with others were cutting bamboo in his bamboo clump, when petitioner along with other named accused persons and 25-30 unknown male and female accused came and started
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60877 of 2024(2) dt.26-09-2024 2/3 assaulting the informant and others with sharp weapons viz. lathi and danda. Thereafter, it is alleged that accused Bhishm Prasad and petitioner pressed his neck by a towel and on alarm, villagers came for their rescue, who were also assaulted by the accused persons by lathi, danda, and accused persons also snatched two mobiles and a golden chain.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no doubt, an occurrence had taken place, but then, there was an altercation on account of dispute relating to land in which both sides assaulted each other. It is further submitted that it does not appear probable that so many accused would have descended on the land of the informant where he claims to have been cutting the bamboo and the occurrence of the nature as alleged took place. It is next submitted that there is no specific allegation of assault against any of the accused persons including the petitioner though Bhism along with petitioner are alleged to have pressed the neck of the informant with towel, but then, the said allegation is ornamental. It is also submitted that persons from the side of the petitioner were also injured.
5. Learned A.P.P. as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the anticipatory bail application, but then, are not in a position to rebut the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60877 of 2024(2) dt.26-09-2024 3/3 submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation of assault is not specific rather is general and omnibus in nature and more than 50 persons have been made accused in the case. It is also submitted that petitioners will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove their innocence.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Dumra P. S. Case No.194 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T