Md. Alamgir Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56348 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2025 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Md. Alamgir Ansari son of Late Dr. Manruddin Ansari @ Dr. Md. Moniruddin Ansari Vill -Noongola, PS- Hajipur Town Dist -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Krishna Prabhat, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown persons shot uncle of informant while he was returning home due to which he died.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56348 of 2025(5) dt.08-12-2025 2/2 investigation. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be father of co-accused Md. Ansari @ Dablu and Bablu. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that name of petitioner surfaced during course of investigation and it has come that it was this petitioner who gave the weapon to co-accused persons to commit the offence.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, gravity of offence and materials that have surfaced during course of investigation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T