Ram Sundar Yadav @ Ram Sundar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56040 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ram Sundar Yadav @ Ram Sundar S/o Ram Kishun Yadav, Resident of Village- Khairatol, Ward No. 11, Post- Silanath, P.S.- Jaynagar, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No.150 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No.877 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of 132 liter Nepali country made liquor from Hero Glamour motorcycle of the petitioner and 135 liter from another motorcycle which were coming to India from Nepal.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that both the motorcycles from where the liquor was seized does not belong to the petitioner as he is not the owner of both the motorcycles. Learned counsel submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56040 of 2025(2) dt.20-08-2025 2/2 that name of petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that seizure list has not been made in accordance with law. He also submits that petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2025 and he has one criminal antecedent, in which, he is on bail. Learned counsel submits that there is no chance of absconding the petitioner or tampering with the evidence and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge (Excise Court) Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No.150 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. No.877 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T