Jitendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58888 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2024 Thana- BARHARIA District- Siwan ====================================================== Jitendra Yadav Son of Late Pundeo Chaudhary Resident of Village - Nawalpur, P.S. - Barharia, District - Siwan, At present - Resident of Village - Chauki Hasan Andhari Bagi, P.S. - G.B. Nagar, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satyendra Rai For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-11-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Barharia P.S. Case No. 44 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner and others are the assailant of the deceased
4. There is allegation against all of them having assaulted the deceased who was young man and who has died because of the brutal assault by the accused persons.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. The petitioner is in jail since 05.04.2024.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58888 of 2024(3) dt.20-11-2024 2/2
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. The learned counsel for the informant has given undertaking in the Court that he will cooperate in the trial and shall produce the witnesses in the trial on the date fixed.
7. Considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is dismissed. The court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.
8. If the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a fresh bail application. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T