Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40186/2014bail granted

Md. Monajeer v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-13The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40186 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2159 Year- 2013 Thana -KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictKATIHAR ====================================================== Md. Monajeer, son of Abdul Sattar, resident of village Rakshi, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Bibi Aliara Khatoon, daughter of Saitur Rahman, at present residing at Thuti Bagh Neem Talla Sukhashan, P.S. Barari, District- Katihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Dayal (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 13-04-2015 The petitioner figured as accused in Complaint Case No.2159/2013, registered on the basis of a complaint submitted by the wife of the petitioner alleging offences including one punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C.

Apprehending arrest, the petitioner filed A.B.P. No. 771/2014 in the court of learned,. The learned Judge rejected the application through order dated 1.9.2014. Hence, this application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section-438 of Cr.P.C. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Whether one goes by the nature of allegations or the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the recent

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40186 of 2014 (3) dt.13-04-2015 2/2 past, the arrest of a person who figured as accused in a case wherein offences punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C. is alleged, is not at all warranted.

Therefore, the application is allowed.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing the bailbond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No.2159/2013, subject to the conditions that:- (a) if any arrangement has been ordered by this Court on earlier occasion, it shall be in force till the disposal of the case before the trial court;

(b) the petitioner shall be under obligation to live with and maintain his wife, if she is otherwise willing; and (c) disposal of this application shall be without prejudice to the proceedings for mediation, if any.

(L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) K.C.jha/- U T