Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41412/2016bail granted

Jai Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-10-03Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41412 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2015 Thana -TISIAUTA District- VAISHALI (HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Jai Ram Singh son of Rajendra Singh Resident of Village-Sastaul, P.S. Tisiauta, Distrct Vaishali .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Rajendra Pd. Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2016 in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 18 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323 and 353/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the allegations are general and omnibus in nature and there is no specific accusation of any overt act against the petitioner. Similarly situated accused persons, namely, Santosh Rai and Rajiv Kumar Sah, have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 37974 of 2016. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-9, District Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 18 of 2015 with the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41412 of 2016 (2) dt.03-10-2016 2/2 petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U