Kishun Kumar Mahta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54535 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- RATANPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Kishun Kumar Mahta S/o Surya Narayan Mehta R/o Village- Sahewan, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Ratanpura, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Pooja Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons came along with 5-6 unknown accused and started abusing, further petitioner assaulted her husband by an iron rod causing injury on head and snatched Rs. 60,000/-, thereafter Vinod and Surya tried to rape the informant by putting a sharp weapon on her neck and Shanti snatched golden chain worth Rs. 70,000/-.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54535 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted submitted that petitioner and the informant are brothers and having dispute relating to property. It is further submitted that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, as has been recorded in the order impugned, which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence. It is next submitted that petitioner is not a criminal and will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T