Gaurav Kumar @ Kumar Gaurav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41098 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Gaurav Kumar @ Kumar Gaurav .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2015 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner being the husband of the informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 498(A), 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accusation is of torture for nonfulfillment of dowry demand. On instruction, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour.
Learned counsel for the informant submits that the offer of the petitioner is acceptable to the informant.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41098 of 2014 (2) dt.27-02-2015 2 / 2 Both sides agree to appear before the learned court below on 16.03.2015 when the petitioner will take back the informant to keep her as wife with full dignity and honour.
Considering the stand of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case No.
of on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned court below in three eventualities i.e., (i) if the matrimonial harmony is substantially restored within one year (ii) or the informant fails to appear before the learned court below (iii) or she gets reluctant to reconcile the issue.
U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) U T