Jayant Kumar Singh @ Jayant @ Sujit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57503 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2023 Thana- JHANJHARPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== JAYANT KUMAR SINGH @ JAYANT @ SUJIT KUMAR SINGH SON OF DILIP KUMAR SINGH RESIDENT OF WARD NO 15 JHANJHARPUR PS JHANJHARPUR DISTRICT MADHUBANI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anshul, Adv.

Mr.Madhav Raj, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prem Kumar Jha, APP For the Informant :

Mr.Dudh Nath Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 IPC. 3.

Allegedly, the petitioner is said to have assaulted his father and when the informant (uncle of the petitioner) went to save him, then the petitioner assaulted the informant with sharp weapon due to which his thumb got split away. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. In the alleged occurrence, both sides have sustained injuries. The petitioner sustained injury all over his body. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57503 of 2023(2) dt.12-10-2023 2/2 further submitted that the present case is a counter blast of Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No.101 of 2023. The injury mentioned in the impugned order does not support the prosecution case as the nature of injury was found grievous caused by hard and blunt substance but the allegation is of assault by sharp weapon. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering that the injury report has not supported the prosecution case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Jhanjharpur P.S. Case No.99 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T