Sanjay Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67048 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-302 Year-2020 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== SANJAY DAS S/o- Chandeshwar Das Resident of Village- Jurkha Dih, P.O. and P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anu Priyadarshni, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 324, 341, 373, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he had gone to his field and started cutting the paddy crop when the accused persons, including the petitioner, came and stopped the informant from cutting the paddy crop, the same was objected by the informant, when the petitioner assaulted him by farsa causing injury on his head and Chandeshwar Das assaulted the mother of the informant and even snatched her gold and silver ornaments.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67048 of 2021(3) dt.25-07-2022 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is further submitted that the injuries are simple in nature and the petitioner had also instituted Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 264 of 2020 against the present informant as such there is a case and a counter-case and the occurrence had taken place on account of land dispute where the injuries have been sustained from both sides but the injuries on both the sides are simple in nature. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 302 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T