Nayan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56585 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2024 Thana- Mufassil District- Purnia ====================================================== Nayan Kumar Singh S/o Sushant Singh R/o Village- New Sipahi Tola, P.S.- Madhubani, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 111 of the B.N.S. and Sections 8(c), 21(c), 25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. As per prosecution case, 5.19 Kg brown sugar was recovered from the dicky of the seized vehicle which was to be supplied to this petitioner.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from possession of this petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused persons.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56585 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and huge quantity of brown sugar was recovered from the seized car which was supposed to be delivered to this petitioner. Petitioner has got two criminal antecedents out of which one is of similar nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, gravity of offence and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T