Vinay Rai @ Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42531 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Lal Babu Bhagat, son of Ramchandra Bhagat, Resident of VillageSalempur, P.S. Lalganj, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.48638 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2016 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. VINAY RAI @ VINAY KUMAR Son of Doman Rai, resident of Village- Salempur, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.42531 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudal Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mukesh Kumar Singh (In Cr.Misc. No.48638 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2016 Both the above-said petitions arise out of Vaishali P.S. Case No. 101 of 2016 registered under Section-392 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the above-said petitions are being heard and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42531 of 2016 (3) dt.25-11-2016 2/2 Petitioners are not named in the first information report but in course of investigation, they were arrested and it is alleged that Number plate of motorcycle and Rs. 40,000/- was recovered from house of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 42531 of 2016 whereas; Rs. 10,000/- was recovered from house of the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 48638 of 2016.
The contention on behalf of petitioners is that the seized cash does not have any particular identification to show that the aforesaid cash was looted money of the present case. Considering the above-said facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioners named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 101 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) A.K.V./- U T