Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43853/2017bail granted

Sunil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43853 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43853 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2017 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Sunil Paswan Son of Pachu Paswan, R/o Village- Manpur, P.S.- Lalganj, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 107 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A), 32(2) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 720 litres of foreign liquor from a truck.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case as he is neither the owner nor the driver of the said truck from which alleged recovery was made and he only happens to be a labourer. Further he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 29.04.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43853 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017 Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge -II - Cum - Special Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 107 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T