Ranjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52522 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2019 Thana- MASAUDHI DistrictPatna ====================================================== RANJAY KUMAR, aged about 40 years, male, Son of Satish Kumar @ Munna @ Satish Sharma Resident of Village-Bera, P.S.-Masouri, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar No1, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 448, 341, 323, 379, 504, 506, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 346 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute as the parties are Gotiya. The petitioner is accused of having assaulted the informant on the head with iron rod but in any event the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri B.N. Tripathi, learned Judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52522 of 2019(2) dt.22-08-2019 2/2 Magistrate 1st Class, Masaurhi, District- Patna in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 346 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T