Gautam Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59344 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2022 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== Gautam Kumar Chaudhary, Son Of Mausan Chaudhary R/O Village- Morma, P.S- Roh, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that petitioner based on a forged driving license, got subsidy of Rs. One Lakh under Chief Minister Rural Transportation Scheme under Scheduled Caste Quota.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that petitioner is a Ward Member of Morma Panchayat and had complained against the informant regarding committing illegality in allotment of Indira Aawas as would be evident from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59344 of 2022(2) dt.21-11-2022 2/2 representation of his wife given to the Collector, as such, he came to be implicated in the present case. The learned counsel next submits that the allegations are in realm of allegation and the petitioner can never think of committing such an illegality. It is next submitted that petitioner has not taken any money by way of subsidy as alleged . Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bailbonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Roh P. S. Case No.200 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The application stands allowed.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will deposit the deficit Court fee within two days from today. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T